i dont understand magnetisation
as in
a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext
propensity within someone
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
its performative
i believe search always should be immersive, because whatever is pre planned and non consuming (what you are looking for is total engulfment by the spectre of the real), a joyous intensity, a flow of virtue
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
god being the centre magnet
its good
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46
it is hopeful
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
what do you think my name is
brb i will read and reply sincerely
Windrush Art Kid Oligarch
sorry i am texting like a slav
was it worth it
its good
or never left
i really havent
what do you mean
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
isaac newton