i was tempted to lie about my name

so the method has to be autonomous

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

division of reality is straying away from it

lol yea

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

isaac

magnetisation/form

so an active mazelike process

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

all that is to say

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

we can only engage in such a way

its good

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

plato

sorry i am texting like a slav

yeah

you cannot feed someone truth

idk

its good short few pages

December 2025

hello reader,

i really havent

what do you think my name is

i really havent