We stand there laughing. The fireworks go off behind him.
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
so the method has to be autonomous
so an active mazelike process
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
not their contents
like first name
yeah
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
i was tempted to lie about my name
i want to do that too
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
sorry i am texting like a slav
we need to be deconstructing our identities
its performative
was it worth it
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
your feed looks like my tumblr
i dont understand magnetisation
isaac
i really havent
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
ion
so at the end
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
no i haven't really read anything
we can only engage in such a way