i dont understand magnetisation
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
so an active mazelike process
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
magnetises a pin
ahnaf abrar
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
we need to be deconstructing our identities
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
yeah
plato
we can only engage in such a way
have you read
isaac newton
i was tempted to lie about my name
thank you
like magnets
...
ion
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
no like which do people call me
that looks like my instagram account
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying