...

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

as in

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

much more tactility

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

that looks like my instagram account

division of reality is straying away from it

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

so an active mazelike process

so the method has to be autonomous

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

or never left

i have read not even 1 book

magnetisation/form

lol

all that is to say

i really havent

Slug

bro i read nothing in my life

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

its performative

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

I wonder if she knew I was down there listening? I wonder if she would've said something more true, more personal, more raw, more heartfelt, more harsh, more seductive, more freeing, more exposing, more risky, more romantic, more rude, more honest, more anything, if there hadn't been an audience.

After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting

not so on: yvf(wthw)