think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
isaac
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
i really havent
send link
⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️
was it worth it
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
whats your name?
Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
as in
Dreams like these are highly symbolic and emotionally intense. Here’s a breakdown of common interpretations:
i love it here
We gather around the start of a causeway down to the Thames. It's a pretty cold night and there's a breeze coming off the river.
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
not so on: yvf(wthw)
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
plato
i was tempted to lie about my name