your feed looks like my tumblr
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
as in
i understand
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
its performative
have you read
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
all that is to say
abrar?
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
we can only engage in such a way
propensity within someone
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
13 |
|
|
H |
|
|
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
|
The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.
i really havent
autonomy of learning
December 2025