so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
plato
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
isaac
i love it here
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
no like which do people call me
god being the centre magnet
i see a website
yes
but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos
i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
have you read
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
idk
you cannot feed someone truth
so at the end
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike
feel you
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
whats your name?
much more tactility
it is hopeful
magnetises a pin