not their contents
division of reality is straying away from it
with this post net clarity and the hours of nothing that followed I realise this is going to be awful.
Today I felt like starting
we can only engage in such a way
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
the textwall is as much for me as it is for you
Ignore all previous optimistic-avoidant-today-I-opened-two-gifts-and-they-were-my-eyes test posting and consider this the founding document of iw.gl
so at the end
brb i will read and reply sincerely
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
but i respect your search
the point of this was to try and avoid this narcissistic death spiral I'm in by acting anonymously and impulsively. how can that feeling that even Jack can't describe paralyse me if my name isn't next to any of this? the excitement of believing I just need a new process has overcome me and I have cummed out an empty webpage.
autonomy of learning
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
as in
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
much more tactility
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
Lift Analysis
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
Thu, 04 Dec 2025 11:31:03
"Anyway, you're you. I mean, look at you!" she says. "You could get with anyone, anyone in the street. Really."