we want to live the knowledge too live the content

i understand

so the method has to be autonomous

you cannot feed someone truth

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

plato

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

magnetisation/form

yeah

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

send your tumblr

lol yea

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

was it worth it

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

what do you mean

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

so an active mazelike process

fw

barren land

this will be about a slug

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

...


nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

its good

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

lol

send link

sorry i am texting like a slav