okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

what do you mean

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

autonomy of learning

division of reality is straying away from it

not their contents

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

so an active mazelike process

much more tactility

i dont understand magnetisation

whats your name?

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

yeah

plato

lol

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

i have read not even 1 book

we need to be deconstructing our identities

no i haven't really read anything

so at the end

i love it here

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

i understand

thank you

i was tempted to lie about my name