and the fake qualifier

so at the end

its good

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

propensity within someone

so the method has to be autonomous

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

that looks like my instagram account

plato

plato

isaac newton

what do you mean

        13       |
                |
                |
            H   |
                |
                |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
                |

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

so an active mazelike process

i was tempted to lie about my name

Imprint, memory, impact, representation, impression

i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike

i really havent

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

but really the thing should be autonomous

i dont understand magnetisation

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

. way too specific.

⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️