not so on: yvf(wthw)
isaac newton
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
all that is to say
as in
autonomy of learning
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
we can only engage in such a way
yeah
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged
The bird dives back into the tree. It shakes, some leaves fall.
"Anyway, you're you. I mean, look at you!" she says. "You could get with anyone, anyone in the street. Really."
i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then
I wonder if she knew I was down there listening? I wonder if she would've said something more true, more personal, more raw, more heartfelt, more harsh, more seductive, more freeing, more exposing, more risky, more romantic, more rude, more honest, more anything, if there hadn't been an audience.
...
theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine
13 |
|
|
H |
|
|
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
|
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
and the fake qualifier
the site i am dreaming
so an active mazelike process