amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

like first name

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

isaac

propensity within someone

much more tactility

thank you

as in

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

magnetises a pin

division of reality is straying away from it

which magnetises chains of pins

i understand

like magnets

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

was it worth it

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

and the fake qualifier

i was tempted to lie about my name

we can only engage in such a way

I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.

i dont understand magnetisation

Above and in front two birds are darting in and out of a tree. Sometimes they collide to fight or maybe mate, but I can't really make it out in the low light. It's just after

dusk

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time