there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

lol

all that is to say

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

so an active mazelike process

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

is everyoneback on tumblr now

its performative

lol yea

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

which magnetises chains of pins

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

idk

ion

it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!

i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then

2 (actually index). two is company

...

wait what is that

no i haven't really read anything