i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

so the method has to be autonomous

propensity within someone

isaac newton

magnetisation/form

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

have you read

division of reality is straying away from it

its good short few pages

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

was it worth it

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

ion

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.

isaac

which magnetises chains of pins

Ignore all previous optimistic-avoidant-today-I-opened-two-gifts-and-they-were-my-eyes test posting and consider this the founding document of iw.gl

not their contents

like magnets

bro i read nothing in my life

hiding from the rain

it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

1

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged

I am below everything.