i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

plato

as in

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

and the fake qualifier

all that is to say

ahnaf abrar

i dont understand magnetisation

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

yeah

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

i understand

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

god being the centre magnet

have you read

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

lol yea

what do you mean

autonomy of learning

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

i love it here

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i was tempted to lie about my name

i really havent

so an active mazelike process

really i want the internet

kind of mythopoesis