okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
i understand
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
so at the end
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
you cannot feed someone truth
not their contents
magnetisation/form
like first name
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
was it worth it
abrar?
ahnaf abrar
Today I felt like starting
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
yeah
idk
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
feel you
i was tempted to lie about my name
i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me
hello reader,
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
somewhere between instagram and chatgpt
The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
i want to do that too