what do you mean

not so on: yvf(wthw)

division of reality is straying away from it

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

idk

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

we can only engage in such a way

its performative

as in

or never left

isaac newton

i love it here

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

what do you think my name is

no like which do people call me

that looks like my instagram account

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i have read not even 1 book

your feed looks like my tumblr

so the method has to be autonomous

Slug

send your tumblr

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

I'm trying to picture the scene inside, like I was trying to picture the scene in the tree.

i want to do that too

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

plato

i dont understand magnetisation

its good short few pages