bro i read nothing in my life

so the method has to be autonomous

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

fw

not their contents

so at the end

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

lol yea

is everyoneback on tumblr now

all that is to say

we can only engage in such a way

or never left

magnetisation/form

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

i have read not even 1 book

much more tactility

you cannot feed someone truth

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

your feed looks like my tumblr

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

whats your name?

have you read

no i haven't really read anything

its good

plato

feel you

i want to do that too

so an active mazelike process

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

we need to be deconstructing our identities

Their voices are saying they haven't and shouldn't fuck but want to so bad, or have fucked and can't again but want to so bad, or something like that. Would this be easier if they were birds? Incel kind of question... I'm not following the conversation, but I'm still listening. He's talking in this slightly begging way. It's a way of talking that asks for pity, like he's already tried appealing to every other one of her sensibilities. Incel kind of observation... Maybe he just talks like that, in some upspeak derivative. Haha unless?