yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
god being the centre magnet
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
no like which do people call me
like magnets
magnetisation/form
we can only engage in such a way
not their contents
so an active mazelike process
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
fw
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
what do you think my name is
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
whats your name?
thank you
much more tactility
so the method has to be autonomous
i love it here
is this you as well
autonomy of learning
yeah
what do you mean
which magnetises chains of pins
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
feel you
that looks like my instagram account
isaac newton
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
i dont understand magnetisation
ion
no i haven't really read anything
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given