i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
hello reader,
feel you
what do you mean
ion
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
so the method has to be autonomous
its good short few pages
propensity within someone
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
division of reality is straying away from it
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
send link
autonomy of learning
we need to be deconstructing our identities
like magnets
all that is to say
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
...
was it worth it
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
plato
god being the centre magnet
I've found the girl, or she's found me, and we're smoking a cigarette while we watch the silhouettes of the French Raj and his fireworks bearer down on the bank.
...