it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i dont understand magnetisation

barren land

yeah

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

we can only engage in such a way

as in

isaac newton

plato

i was tempted to lie about my name

magnetises a pin

its performative

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

propensity within someone

magnetisation/form

so the method has to be autonomous

what do you think my name is

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

plato

ahnaf abrar

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

have you read

Windrush Art Kid Oligarch

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

something religious, a kind of complex,

it will get lighter

, something washing, cleansing, revealing, etc.

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

"Put a blanket."

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people