abrar?

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

was it worth it

sorry i am texting like a slav

i really havent

no i haven't really read anything

whats your name?

autonomy of learning

is this you as well

its good short few pages

i dont understand magnetisation

you cannot feed someone truth

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i want to do that too

i love it here

what do you mean

and the fake qualifier

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

we can only engage in such a way

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

have you read

ion

propensity within someone

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

and the fake qualifier

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

what do you think my name is

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

isaac

like magnets

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation