i dont understand magnetisation
autonomy of learning
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
much more tactility
propensity within someone
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
magnetisation/form
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
so the method has to be autonomous
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
bro i read nothing in my life
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
was it worth it
i really havent
i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then
its performative
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
was it worth it
like magnets
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
and the fake qualifier
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
we need to be deconstructing our identities
the site i am dreaming
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
which magnetises chains of pins
bro i read nothing in my life
...