we can only engage in such a way

its good

have you read

sorry i am texting like a slav

its good

fw

like magnets

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

i understand

not their contents

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.

Sun, 02 Nov 2025 21:54:03

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged

ion

i dont understand magnetisation

or never left

yeah

somewhere between instagram and chatgpt

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

lol yea

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i love it here

Rain, starting

it is hopeful