there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

plato

that looks like my instagram account

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

we can only engage in such a way

not their contents

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

as in

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

propensity within someone

its performative

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

Style

Today I felt like starting

1

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

i have read not even 1 book

isaac

i dont understand magnetisation

...

and so on. not wanting the rhyming / clanging

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it


you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

. way too specific.

Thu, 06 Nov 2025 21:22:59

IWGD


its good

we want to live the knowledge too live the content