lol

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

as in

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

magnetisation/form

so at the end

much more tactility

abrar?

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

its good

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

its good

we need to be deconstructing our identities

feel you

ion

plato

lol yea

idk

have you read

fw

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

we can only engage in such a way

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

send your tumblr

what do you mean

yeah

but i respect your search

that looks like my instagram account

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

propensity within someone

theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine