not their contents
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
as in
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
we need to be deconstructing our identities
you cannot feed someone truth
bro i read nothing in my life
division of reality is straying away from it
isaac
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
like first name
the site i am dreaming
...
...
its good
wait what is that
The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.
was it worth it
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
hello reader,
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.
plato
December 2025