what do you mean

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

magnetisation/form

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

not their contents

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

as in

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

that looks like my instagram account

so an active mazelike process

propensity within someone

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

its good

ahnaf abrar

all that is to say

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

isaac newton

thank you

isaac

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

is this you as well

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

...

I wonder if she knew I was down there listening? I wonder if she would've said something more true, more personal, more raw, more heartfelt, more harsh, more seductive, more freeing, more exposing, more risky, more romantic, more rude, more honest, more anything, if there hadn't been an audience.

feel you