i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
not their contents
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
plato
abrar?
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
idk
what do you mean
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
autonomy of learning
whats your name?
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
have you read
i really havent
was it worth it
isaac
its performative
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
i was tempted to lie about my name
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
we can only engage in such a way
magnetises a pin
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
its good
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
so an active mazelike process
magnetisation/form