we want to live the knowledge too live the content
a heavy, heavy rain. a clear day.
I created this site
.Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:27:13
the point of this was to try and avoid this narcissistic death spiral I'm in by acting anonymously and impulsively. how can that feeling that even Jack can't describe paralyse me if my name isn't next to any of this? the excitement of believing I just need a new process has overcome me and I have cummed out an empty webpage.
what do you mean
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
It's
dusk
in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
magnetisation/form
Windrush Art Kid Oligarch
not their contents
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46
you cannot feed someone truth
we can only engage in such a way
idk
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.
as in
fw
"Anyway, you're you. I mean, look at you!" she says. "You could get with anyone, anyone in the street. Really."
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 21:54:03
all that is to say
no longer writing in the third person
a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
your feed looks like my tumblr