think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

but really the thing should be autonomous

i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it

yes

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

or never left

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

is this you as well

Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46

i want to do that too

yeah

much more tactility

Picture

so an active mazelike process

bro i read nothing in my life

He was a proper old-fashioned London geezer (cringe word, hate it, can't think of a better one, worst of all it's the correct word), kind of East Endy, kind of Real London, the kind you don't really meet but if you do it always feels like an uncanny immersive theatre experience. They're anachronistic. They only belong in the London collectively imagined by people who don't spend any time in it.

...

Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.



was it worth it

something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever

i understand

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️

not so on: yvf(wthw)

After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting

Thank you, Jack