my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

autonomy of learning

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

bro i read nothing in my life

as in

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

idk

not so on: yvf(wthw)

magnetisation/form

propensity within someone

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

There is a pause. She ashes her cigarette. It falls on me. It seems like the birds have stopped too.

not their contents

the textwall is as much for me as it is for you

...

I am below everything.

This is a website run by a narcissist who can't produce anything without the hope that it is seen and loved but can't act due to the fear of it being seen and hated. They immediately feel the need to ask Jack GPT to define whatever this feeling is in the hope that understanding it will mean control over it and control over it will mean that they can stop it.

But seriously, thank you, Jack

its performative

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls