nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
division of reality is straying away from it
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
what do you mean
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
its good
Better Lift
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
i see a website
abrar?
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
and the fake qualifier
no i haven't really read anything
yeah
have you read
barren land
i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it
is everyoneback on tumblr now
It's
dusk
in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext
but really the thing should be autonomous
propensity within someone
lol yea
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
we can only engage in such a way