i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
much more tactility
that looks like my instagram account
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
barren land
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
its performative
what do you mean
its good
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
its good short few pages
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
so at the end
its good
yeah
autonomy of learning
lol yea
13 |
|
|
H |
|
|
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
|
Thu, 04 Dec 2025 11:31:03
hiding from the rain
Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.
I wonder if she knew I was down there listening? I wonder if she would've said something more true, more personal, more raw, more heartfelt, more harsh, more seductive, more freeing, more exposing, more risky, more romantic, more rude, more honest, more anything, if there hadn't been an audience.
no i haven't really read anything
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
plato
division of reality is straying away from it
sorry i am texting like a slav
send your tumblr