what do you think my name is

and the fake qualifier

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

not their contents

no like which do people call me

no longer writing in the third person

i have read not even 1 book

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

magnetisation/form

we can only engage in such a way

feel you

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

as in