there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
much more tactility
as in
autonomy of learning
i really havent
its good short few pages
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
i really havent
was it worth it
that looks like my instagram account
i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
December 2025
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.
so at the end
really i want the internet
isaac
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
i am quite illiterate on producing technology
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
...
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine