mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

we can only engage in such a way

its good

ion

all that is to say

god being the centre magnet

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

so an active mazelike process

whats your name?

magnetises a pin

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

what do you mean

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

brb i will read and reply sincerely

thank you

no longer writing in the third person

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

is everyoneback on tumblr now

i really havent

no i haven't really read anything

Today I felt like starting

IWGD

I'm trying to picture the scene inside, like I was trying to picture the scene in the tree.