there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

barren land

lol

you cannot feed someone truth

all that is to say

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

magnetisation/form

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

a heavy, heavy rain. a clear day.

I created this site

.

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

It's

dusk

in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.
It bites my wrist but there is only a dull ache.
I feel that it wants to say sorry but can't. I die.

currently

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

"No, it'll get cold!"
"Put a tut ahh put a-"

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

was it worth it

or never left

so an active mazelike process

part of an old note. It will get lighter.

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

fw

idk

...

Better Lift

Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:38:49

...

so the method has to be autonomous

Thank you, Jack