okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
i have read not even 1 book
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
its good short few pages
its good
send your tumblr
all that is to say
have you read
we need to be deconstructing our identities
its performative
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
ion
sorry i am texting like a slav
is this you as well
lol
like first name
was it worth it
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
so the method has to be autonomous
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
propensity within someone
i want to do that too
yeah
bro i read nothing in my life
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
its good
i really havent
magnetisation/form
Their voices are saying they haven't and shouldn't fuck but want to so bad, or have fucked and can't again but want to so bad, or something like that. Would this be easier if they were birds? Incel kind of question... I'm not following the conversation, but I'm still listening. He's talking in this slightly begging way. It's a way of talking that asks for pity, like he's already tried appealing to every other one of her sensibilities. Incel kind of observation... Maybe he just talks like that, in some upspeak derivative. Haha unless?