mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
abrar?
have you read
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
its good short few pages
its performative
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
not their contents
was it worth it
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
much more tactility
and the fake qualifier
you cannot feed someone truth
ion
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
like magnets
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
i really havent
what do you mean
lol
bro i read nothing in my life
and the fake qualifier
...
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people