brb i will read and reply sincerely
"No, it'll get cold!"
"Put a tut ahh put a-"
its good
bro i read nothing in my life
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
but really the thing should be autonomous
autonomy of learning
something religious, a kind of complex,
it will get lighter
, something washing, cleansing, revealing, etc.okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
i really havent
feel you