think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

your feed looks like my tumblr

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

autonomy of learning

magnetisation/form

yeah

not their contents

fw

isaac newton

whats your name?

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

which magnetises chains of pins

like first name

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

bro i read nothing in my life

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

It Will Get Lighter

lol

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

abrar?

I'm trying to picture the scene inside, like I was trying to picture the scene in the tree.

all that is to say

we can only engage in such a way

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time