you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

is this you as well

its performative

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

what do you think my name is

was it worth it

idk

so at the end

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

so the method has to be autonomous

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

abrar?

i dont understand magnetisation

much more tactility

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

plato

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

its good

or never left

we can only engage in such a way

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

i really havent

i want to do that too

the site i am dreaming

i really havent

and the fake qualifier

that looks like my instagram account

part of an old note. It will get lighter.

as in

isaac

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

send link

was it worth it