my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
is this you as well
its performative
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
what do you think my name is
was it worth it
idk
so at the end
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
so the method has to be autonomous
abrar?
i dont understand magnetisation
much more tactility
plato
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
its good
or never left
we can only engage in such a way
i really havent
i want to do that too
the site i am dreaming
i really havent
and the fake qualifier
that looks like my instagram account
as in
isaac
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
send link
was it worth it