the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
ahnaf abrar
i really havent
god being the centre magnet
i dont understand magnetisation
its good
its good
no i haven't really read anything
lol
ion
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
no like which do people call me
abrar?
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
not their contents
its good short few pages
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
i want to do that too
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
what do you mean
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i was tempted to lie about my name
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
we need to be deconstructing our identities
plato