i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike
its performative
send your tumblr
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
we can only engage in such a way
send link
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
feel you
i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then
Dreams like these are highly symbolic and emotionally intense. Here’s a breakdown of common interpretations:
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
Overall meaning: The dream seems to explore vulnerability, unspoken emotion, and the tension between connection and isolation. It suggests you may be processing intense feelings of longing or missed opportunities, and your subconscious is guiding you to acknowledge, release, or transform them.
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
magnetises a pin
was it worth it
...
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
much more tactility
as in