you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
idk
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
so at the end
all that is to say
autonomy of learning
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
so an active mazelike process
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
division of reality is straying away from it
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
hello reader,
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 23:49:08
so the method has to be autonomous
It's
dusk
in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.that looks like my instagram account
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation