autonomy of learning
i really havent
we can only engage in such a way
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
division of reality is straying away from it
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
and the fake qualifier
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
its good
ion
no i haven't really read anything
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
plato
magnetisation/form
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
bro i read nothing in my life
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
was it worth it
what do you mean
so the method has to be autonomous
is this you as well
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
whats your name?
its performative
ahnaf abrar
you cannot feed someone truth
i want to do that too
The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.
...
...