there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

have you read

thank you

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

i understand

we can only engage in such a way

which magnetises chains of pins

autonomy of learning

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

you cannot feed someone truth

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

propensity within someone

so an active mazelike process

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

god being the centre magnet

whats your name?

isaac

sorry i am texting like a slav

2 (actually index). two is company

⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️

isaac newton

Lift Analysis

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

the site i am dreaming

wait what is that

It's

dusk

in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.
It bites my wrist but there is only a dull ache.
I feel that it wants to say sorry but can't. I die.

it is hopeful

"No, it'll get cold!"
"Put a tut ahh put a-"

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason